扫 描 看 全 文
邹小平，姜英龙，朱旭，等.基于FAHP的核电用不锈钢焊丝工艺性综合量化评价［J］.电焊机，2022，52（7）：121-127.
ZOU Xiaoping, JIANG Yinglong, ZHU Xu, et al.Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Stainless Steel Welding Wire Processability for Nuclear Power Based on FAHP[J].Electric Welding Machine, 2022, 52(7): 121-127.
近年来焊接材料的焊接工艺稳定性受到了广泛的关注，对焊材的工艺性一般依据经验进行感性评价，缺乏客观依据，为此对焊丝焊道成形质量进行综合量化评价，对于设计方、焊材研制单位、制造厂意义重大。本文基于模糊层次分析法（Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process ，FAHP），建立不锈钢焊丝焊道成形质量综合评价体系，包括了焊道尺寸、焊道颜色、焊道直线度三个一级指标，并建立相对应的二、三级评价指标，权重确定重点突出成形稳定性，建立了优先关系矩阵，对优先关系矩阵进行加性一致性改造成模糊一致矩阵，计算出各指标的权重向量，再次依托TS模糊模型，根据底层采样的范围确定隶属度函数对采样数据进行层层计算，最终实现了综合量化评价，并设计试验对模型进行了验证，对评价结果进行了最大隶属度原则有效性检验，最终结果表明：四个厂家的焊道成形质量隶属“优+良”的程度由高到低排序为2#、3#、1#、4#。
In recent years, the welding process stability of welding materials has received extensive attention. The processability of welding material is generally evaluated by experience without objective basis. Therefore, comprehensive quantitative evaluation of welding wire weld bead quality is of great significance to the designers, welding materials development units and manufacturers. Based on the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) method, a comprehensive evaluation system is established for the weld bead quality of stainless steel welding wire, including three first-grade index of weld bead size, bead color and bead straightness, and corresponding second-grade and third-grade evaluation index are also established. The weight determination focuses on forming stability, and the priority relationship matrix is established. The priority relationship matrix is transformed into a fuzzy consistent matrix with additive consistency, and the weight vectors of each index are calculated. Relying on the TS fuzzy and according to the scope of the bottom layer sampling model, the membership function is determined, and the sampled data is calculated layer by layer, and finally a comprehensive quantitative evaluation is realized. The model is tested and verified by design tests, and the evaluation results are tested for the validity of the maximum membership principle. The result shows that the bead forming quality of the four manufacturers is ranked 2#, 3#, 1#, 4# in descending order of "excellent + good".
模糊层次分析法不锈钢焊丝量化评价成形质量
fuzzy analytic hierarchy processstainless steel welding wirequantitative evaluationforming quality
GAO Xiangdong， WANG Lin， CHEN Ziqin， et al. Process stability analysis and weld formation evaluation during disk laser-mag hybrid welding［J］. Optics and Lasers in Engineering，2020，124：105835.
LIU Liming， YU Shibao， SONG Gang，et al. Analysis of arc stability and bead forming with high-speed TW-GIA welding［J］. Journal of Manufacturing Processes，2019，46：67-76.
王宝，宋永伦，D.Rehfeldt. 焊接材料工艺行的分析与评价［J］. 电焊机， 2006， 36（11）： 11-13，19.
Wang Bao， Song Yonglun，D.Rehfeldt. Analysis and evaluation of the usability of welding consumables ［J］. Electric Welding Machine， 2006， 36（11）： 11-13，19.
李亮玉，刘景奎，苏淑靖，等. 焊条工艺性能模糊综合评判［J］. 焊接学报， 1995（02）： 57-61.
LI Liangyu，LIU Jingkui，SU Shujing，et al.Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of electrode usability［J］.Transactions of the China Welding Institution，1995（02）：57-61.
Masaya Shigeta，Takahiro Ikeda，Manabu Tanaka，et al. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of arc characteristics in SMAW［C］. Welding in the World， 2016.
Balasubramanian V，Varahamoorthy R，Ramachandran C S，et al. Selection of welding process for hardfacing on carbon steels based on quantitative and qualitative factors［J］. The International Journal of Advanced Man-ufacturing Technology，2009，40（9-10）：887-897.
孟凡军，朱胜，曹勇，等. 脉冲MAG堆焊成形焊道表面质量模糊综合评价［J］. 焊接学报， 2008（7）： 25-28，114.
Meng Fanjun， Zhu Sheng， Cao Yong， et al. Fuzzy synthesis estimation of bead surface quality for pluse MAG welding prototyping［J］.Transactions of the China Welding Institution， 2008（7）：25-28，114.
Simrandeep Singh Thapar， Himali Sarangal. Quantifying reusability of software components using hybrid fuzzy analytical hierarchy process （FAHP）-Metrics approach［J］. Applied Soft Computing， 2020， 88（3）：105997.
Olayinka Mohammed Olabanji， Khumbulani Mpofu. Hybridized fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy weighted average for identifying optimal design concept［J］. Heliyon，2020，6（1）：03182.
童一周，徐俊龙，崔毅.基于模糊层次分析法的核安全设备持证单位量化评价研究［J］. 核安全， 2021， 20（05）：16-20.
Tong Yizhou， Xu Junlong， Cui Yi. Quantitative Evaluation of Nuclear Safety Equipment Certification Unit Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process［J］. Nuc-lear Safety， 2021， 20（5）： 16-20.
郭枭，徐锴，邹力维.基于Matlab-FIS的带极堆焊成形质量模糊综合评价［J］.焊接学报， 2013， 34（08）： 89-91，100，117.
Guo Xiao， Xu Kai， Zou Liwei. Fuzzy comprehensive assessment of prototyping quality for strip cladding based on MATLAB-FIS［J］. Transactions of the China welding institution， 2013， 34（08）： 89-91，100，117.
Geng Peng， Lu Han， Zeyan Liu， et al. An Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Risk Evaluation Model［J］. Frontiers in Psychology， 2021， 12：715003.
高建思，王贵君，孙刚.基于三角形隶属函数输入的Mamdani模糊系统的混沌遗传算法［J］.东北师大学报（自然科学版）， 2019， 51（01）： 13-17.
Gao Jiansi， Wang Guijun， Sun Gang. Chaotic genetic algorithm of Mamdani fuzzy system based on triangle menmbership function［J］. Journal of Northeast Normal University （Natural Science Edition）， 2019， 51（01）：13-17.
韩利，梅强，陆玉梅，等. AHP-模糊综合评价方法的分析与研究［J］. 中国安全科学学报，2004，14（7）：86-89.
Han Li， Mei Qiang， Lu Yumei，et al. Analysis andstudy on AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation［J］. China Safety Science Journal， 2004， 14（7）： 86-89.
相关作者
相关机构
公网安备11010802024621